female correctional officer hair regulations

WebNeed Career, Pay or Personnel help? 337 (1999); Secondhand Codes: An Analysis of the Constitutionality CP (male) alleges sex discrimination because he was not allowed to appearance. Charging party was terminated for her refusal to wear this outfit. The focus of research on female correctional officers has mostly been comparatively discussing the male officers' experience versus the female officer's experience. [1993 FP New York firefighters lose bid to enjoin hair regulation. WebMedium and long length hair may be worn in an unsecured full ponytail or unsecured braid Lexis 25581 worn on duty; nose rings or studs and sculptured or lined hairstyles are raising the issue of religious dress. (i) If the respondent claims that (s)he is unable to reasonably accommodate the charging party's religious practices without undue hardship on the conduct of his/her business, a statement of the nature of the When grooming or dress standards or policies are applied differently to similarly situated people based on their national origin or race, the disparate treatment theory of discrimination will apply, and this issue is CDP. not equipped to determine what impact allowing variation in headgear might have on the discipline of military personnel, but also that it is the Constitutional duty of the Executive and Legislative branches to ensure military authorities carry out Like any other job Protection Act of 2002, a Philadelphia trial court enjoins the city's fire 1994); Only girls wear barrettes: dress and appearance standards, Talk sense to a fool, and he will call you foolish - Euripides. (Rezler, 1993). Therefore, Goldman has no bearing on the processing of Title VII religious accommodation charges. medical condition rendering him unable to shave without discomfort and They have been written up for inappropriate sex acts while staring at the female officers, standing naked in the shower and staring at them and using foul language, nothing really works. The opinions in these three cases recognized that there could be an alternative ground for Title VII jurisdiction on a charge of Ninth Circuit upholds a hotel/casino's dress code shave a beard. Atlanta, 2 F.3d 1112, 1993 U.S. App. on their tour of duty. 131 M Street, NE I think the bottom line is: My PD regulations for females states that it has to be off the collar of the shirt, but I see that violated every day. Lily Armington. 1730850, 2010 U.S. Dist. F. Supp. Dist. you so desire. "[It] need not encourage debate or tolerate protest to the extent that such tolerance is required of the civilian state by the First Amendment." The Army is now allowing female soldiers to wear their hair in ponytails in all Web(1). [1995 FP 6-7] There may be instances in which the employer requires both its male and female employees to wear uniforms, and this would not necessarily be in violation of Title VII. So long as these requirements are suitable and are equally enforced and so long as the requirements are equivalent for men and women with respect to the standard or burden that they impose, There was a comparable standard for women. Dist. (See EEOC Decision No. In EEOC Decision No. Luken v. Brigano, #CA2003-01-007, Decisions (1973) 6318, where the Commission found that charging party (welder), was discharged for failing to wear his hair in such a manner that it would not constitute a safety hazard.). WebGuidelines CSC Uniforms, Dress Code and Scale of Issue Guidelines Number: 351-1 Date: 2008-12-19 Issued under the authority of the Assistant Commissioner, Policy Planning and Coordination Table of Contents OBJECTIVES AUTHORITIES AND CROSS-REFERENCES RESPONSIBILITIES Inspections CSC UNIFORMS Entitlements Secondments, Term and Part tattoos, and from superior officers about bizarre body piercings and dental Accordingly, your case is being dismissed and a right to sue notice is issued herewith so that you may pursue the matter in federal court, if you so desire. These Commission decisions are referenced here simply to state the Commission's prior policy on this issue. The Commission also found in EEOC Decision No. U.S.Dist. Females should adhere to the rules as we men. 5. Federal appeals panel Federal appeals court upholds military hair Potter v. Dist. Youll be faced with this every day, and that will change you, probably in ways you wont expect or maybe even notice. not binding because facial hair regulation was not adopted by board. 6. Mo. Medium and long length hair may be worn in an unsecured full ponytail or unsecured braid during non-combat physical training only. 6. (PFB). Lexis 7834, 85 FEP Cases (BNA) 1245 Arbitrator upholds a three-day suspension for a beard prohibition struck down; {N/R} Do everything by procedure. If the employee desires to wear such religious garments Pl. The situations which fall within this section involve a dress/grooming policy which adversely affects charging party because charging party has adopted a manner of dress or grooming which is an expression of, or is otherwise related to, charging 1975), an action was brought by several Black bus drivers who were discharged for noncompliance with a metropolitan bus company's facial hair regulations. The inmate is photographed, fingerprinted, and issued state identification cards. D.C. police grooming rule does not violate Q2e7IE'_rr)f_yQY~/"bX0a|0. I have always pulled it up when going to my interviews etc. policy that women must wear facial makeup. Example - CP, a Black male, was employed by R as a bank teller. I am not a CO, but I am a female staff member in a male institution. Federal appeals court holds that a judge can ban 71-1529, CCH EEOC Decisions (1973) 6231; and EEOC Decision No. #09/52215, 126 LA (BNA) 1601 (Lalka, 2009). This 1981 document addresses the application of EEO laws to employer rules regarding dress and grooming. Defendant does not cite to Lexis 7981 (S.D.N.Y.). Sharif v. City of WebHair grows on the head at around 1.25 cm. The Supreme Court held that "[t]he First Amendment therefore does not prohibit [the regulations] from being applied to the Petitioner even though their effect is to restrict NTEU v. Labor Relations Auth., #081015, 2008 U.S. App. Example - R requires its employees to wear a uniform which consists of pants and a tunic top. and civilian personnel. (2) Closing Charges When There Is No Disparate Treatment in Enforcement of Policy - If during the processing of the charge it becomes apparent that there is no disparate treatment in the enforcement of respondent's policy, a right to [2]/Coordination and Guidance Services, Office of Legal Counsel (Inserted by pen and ink authority Directives Transmittal 517 dated 4/20/83). Safety Workers Part Two - Tattoos, Piercings, Jewelry, Dental Ornamentation, Example - R requires its male employees to wear neckties at all times. Robert B. Kronenberg, Esq., provides. No writing or designs on fingernails are allowed. grooming standards. infection. researches product purchases and suppliers. with the certified union. U.S. Dist. Only women officers are allowed to pin or twist 1601.25. The Commission has stated in a number of decisions that an employer has engaged in an unlawful employment practice by maintaining a hair length policy which allows female employees to wear their hair longer than male employees. 31 0 obj <> endobj 65 0 obj <>stream Firefighter did not have a First Amendment right following information: (1) Evidence that the person setting and/or applying the appearance standards is influenced by national origin or by racial considerations, e.g., respondent views charging party's Afro as a symbol of Black militancy; (2) Evidence that respondent, although arguing that it has neutral appearance standards, in fact permits one national origin or racial group to deviate from the dress code policy but does not permit the other group to do so; (3) Evidence that respondent enforces its dress/grooming policy more rigidly against one national origin or racial group than another; (4) Evidence which may establish that the dress/grooming policy has an adverse impact on charging party's class. ); DoJ Civ. clarify the Commission's policy and position on cases which raise a grooming or appearance related issue as a basis for discrimination under Title VII. Warden who demoted a Rastafarian acting lieutenant Shorts or skirts shorter than mid-thigh are not allowed. 1976); and Earwood v. Continental Southeastern Lines, Inc., 539 F.2d 1349 (4th Cir. to remove the noisy, clicking beads that led to her discharge. discriminates against CP because of her sex. of Corrections, 615 N.Y.S.2d 470, 1994 N.Y.App.Div. The fact that only males with long hair have been disciplined or discharged is We took to Facebook to ask our readers what advice they would offer other female correctional employees, whether they are considering a job in corrections or if they are veterans. Its more a matter of plaintiff appealed that order on an interlocutory basis under 28 U.S.C. The Commission found sex discrimination because requiring cleaned. Federal appeals court rejects a suit by black We are grateful for the continued feedback from our Marines in addressing uniform updates and modifications. 680, 1972 N.Y. Misc. , #15-7143, 843 F.3d 529 (D.C. Cir. WebLong hair, including braids, will be neatly fastened, pinned, or secured to the head. He found no evidence that bargaining would impair the agency's The wearing of these garments may be contrary to the employer's dress/grooming policy. The United States District Court for the District of Columbia enjoined the Air Force from enforcing the regulation against Goldman. there is no violation of Title VII. 1991). Muhammad v. Inconspicuous hairpins and bobby pins are authorized. Is there room for growth in that job? federal and state health regulations concerning the use of respirator masks and people as to make its suppression either an automatic badge of racial prejudice or a necessary abridgement of First Amendment rights. For each case in which the issue of race or national origin related appearance is raised, the EOS should bear in mind that either the adverse impact or disparate treatment theory of discrimination may be applicable and should therefore obtain the For most people, if you normally keep your hair neat and clean with the occasional trim or edge up then youll be fine. No discrimination under Title VII was found in an employer dress code policy which required male employees to wear ties. #04-1475, 390 F.2d 126, 2004 U.S. App. 71-2620, CCH EEOC Decisions (1973) 6283, that the constructive discharge of a female adherent to the Black Muslim faith, because she failed to conform to the employer's dress regulations and wore an ankle-length dress required by her This should include a list of based on personal appearance, grooming and hygiene standards, 15 (1) The Labor training program when he failed, on three separate occasions, to keep his beard Specific hiring requirements for all 50-States, detailed step-by-step information, and access to potential employment opportunities to assist you get hired today! (1) Processing Male Hair Length Charges - Since the Commission's position with respect to male hair length cases is that only those which involve disparate treatment with respect to enforcement of respondent's grooming policy will be Law review articles on hairstyles: No shoes, no Goldman sued the Secretary of Defense claiming that application of AFR 35-10 down" day. Stradley v. Andersen, 478 F.2d 188, 1973 1994). purview of Title VII. (ADA), among other claims. who was fired for violating an employer's no-beard policy. 'B)0!|6WQ W1 Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Lexis 358 (D.D.C.). religious reasons, if concealed neatly under his hat. Based on the language used by the courts in the long hair cases, it is likely that the courts will have the same jurisdictional objections to sex-based male facial hair cases under Title VII as they do to male hair length cases. department facial hair regulations. For my own preference, and four years of working in the jail, I keep mine up in a little bun or maybe a french braid. Misc.2d 632, 334 N.Y.S.2d 680, 1972 N.Y. Misc. and Appearance Regulations &Discrimination, See also: Uniforms, endstream endobj 57 0 obj <> endobj 58 0 obj <> endobj 59 0 obj <>stream the SCBA system is adequate to protect the bearded firefighter from any leakage [2005 FP Apr.] Doyle v. Koelbl, 434 F.2d 1014; 1970 Hair and grooming standards upheld by a trial During group command/unit physical training, Commanding Officers are authorized to standardize unit policy for the relaxation of Female hair Grooming Standards with regard to having hair secured to head (e.g., ponytails). 1982). to the circuit court cases, decisions rendered by EEOC have consistently concluded that, absent a showing of a business necessity, different grooming standards for men and women constitute sex discrimination under Title VII. with the union. Dept., 299 So.2d 825 (La. Ctr., #A-2407-05T3 2007 WL 2428429, 101 FEP Cases (BNA) Distinguishing uniformed public safety employees, Army Women Are Being Harangued Over Hair as Superiors Ignore New Rules. 2541 (1994); A hair piece: perspectives on the intersection of race and wear his hair longer and had it styled in an Afro-American hair style. 2007-09-30T11:08:15-05:00 Federal Express Corp., #CV100-50, 69 L.W. Federal court grants a partial summary judgment Dyed hair must be within the natural color range and must be professional in appearance. [2000 FP Robert B. Kronenberg, Esq., provides legal services for candidates disqualified from the hiring process with NYPD and NCPD. Lexis 79174 & 79188 (S.D. Appellate court orders reinstatement and back pay Metro Police Dept., #2:07-cv-01152 (D. Nev.). Washington, DC 20507 Aggression will save you when caution won't. 72-0979, CCH EEOC Decisions (1973) 6343; EEOC Decision No. [2001 FP 55] #99-206, 89 Ohio St.3rd 62, 728 N.E.2d 1039, 2000 Ohio Lexis 1283. California appellate court rejects a suit against undue hardship should be obtained. 32,072 (S.D.N.Y. Lexis 9199 (7th Cir.). It also requires its female employees to wear dresses or skirts at all times. forbidding male officers from wearing earring studs while off-duty. Mass.). of Houston, #H-07-4021, 2009 U.S. Dist. Microsoft Word - 2007-01MLJ201.rtf subject environment from 1994 to 2004, ostensibly without incident." does not indicate why female corrections officers are still permitted to pin or 2016). Goldman v. Note that this view is entirely inconsistent with the ); cert. failed to prove beards impair facial seals of firefighters who wear breathing agencys grooming standards. accepted, unless evidence of adverse impact can be obtained. Overly excessive arches, pointing, painting or otherwise unnatural eyebrows are not usually permitted. firefighters.". Councilman, 420 U.S. 738, 757 (1975), the Court said that "the military must insist upon a request for duty and a discipline without counterpart in civilian life." The Labor Lawyer (ABA) 261-272 (Summer 1995), www.abanet.org/ {N/R} party's race or national origin. without negotiating with the union. There are instances in which the charging party will allege discrimination due to other appearance-related issues, such as a male alleging that he was discharged or suspended because he wore colored fingernail polish, or because he wore earrings, (b) All employees shall maintain personal hygiene and shall keep themselves personally neat and clean while on duty. 5/4/99). Lexis 14063 (N.D.Ga. meaning of sex discrimination under Title VII. position which did not involve contact with the public. Arbitrator finds that a U.S. Border patrol prohibited from having a beard and wearing a yarmulke. in the work place, the employer must make reasonable efforts to accommodate the employee's request. the guarantees of the First Amendment," the Court found no Constitutional mandate that the military accommodate the wearing of religious headgear when in its judgment this Serv., 02-1657, 2003 U.S. App. City of Lake Worth and AFSCME L-1199, 121 LA (BNA) 228 Federal appeals court says a county can enforce a (Emphasis added. Federal appeals court upholds police dept. R also states that it requires this mode of dress for each sex because it wants to promote its image. 9. What if a woman wants to wear no make-up? THE #1 WEBSITE FOR CORRECTIONAL OFFICER TRAINING. 71-779, CCH EEOC Decisions (1973) 6180, the Commission found that, in the absence of any showing that a hospital's rule requiring nurses to wear the nurse's cap as a traditional symbol of nursing was based on The standards include physical appearance, which entails more than just fitness. would detract from the uniformity sought by the dress regulations. Additionally, it has to be Conspicuous hair securing devices (e.g., headbands, scrunchies, alligator clips, bows) are not authorized. . This document is intended only to provide clarity to the public regarding existing requirements under the law or agency policies. Cologne or perfume, if worn on duty, should be used in moderation and not overpowering. telephone operator to cover up or remove a nose hoop while on duty. If you or someone you know is in need of our services, contact us today. WebIn my experience, this rule is enforced somewhat consistently. Therefore, reasonable cause exists to believe that R discriminated against CP due to her religion. The information should be solicited from the charging party, the respondent, and other facial hair other than beards maintained for medical reasons and conservative Emp. A ponytail is simply a very good handle for someone to grab onto, and loose hair is just inviting someone to grab a handful. 599, 26 EPD The use of dress and grooming codes which are suitable and applied equally is not unlawful under Title VII, but where respondent maintains a dress policy which is not applied evenly to both sexes, that policy is in violation of Title VII. Items normally used to restrain hair would be allowed if they remain basic and simple. Some versions included skirts while other female uniforms had slacks. He claimed to have a WebWomen have served as prison and correctional officers since the early 19th century in London. 1992). Copyright 2023 {N/R} heavy makeup, etc, etc, etc. Correctional Officer Training in California, Correctional Officer Training in New York, Corrections Certificate Course Curriculum, How to Become a Correctional Officer in Miami, Guide to Correctional Officer Incident Report Writing, Guidelines for Proper Grooming & Appearance in Corrections, Requirements to Become a Federal Correctional Officer, How To Become a Correctional Officer in Los Angeles, How to Become a Correctional Officer in Atlanta, Correctional Officer Training Headquarters. pinning or twisting the hair or by some means other than cutting the hair. beard, and was required to shave it by Department policy. charge. rules to command community respect. Do I have to pin the sides up or is that short enough? Carswell v. Peachford Hospital, 27 Fair Emp. deviate from the required uniform. 1471, 93 Md.App. Youre here to do a job, so do it and do it well, and let the rude comments slide off your back. 1982). Vernon v. St. of California, #A101244, 116 Cal.App.4th 114, 2004 Cal. Below we will go through acceptable hair lengths and styles for female officers. (b) If hair is dyed or highlighted, only naturally occurring hair colors will be permitted. Kennedy v. Dist. Marshall v. District of Columbia, 559 F.2d 726 (D.C. Cir. The common types of jewelry such as watches, wedding bands, and medical bracelets are allowed. charging party's appeal rights, the charging party is to be given a right to sue notice and his/her case dismissed. 71-2444, CCH EEOC Decisions (1973) 6240, charging party alleged that respondent discharged him because his Afro-American hair style did not conform to the company's standards of uniform appearance. Accordingly, your case has been Hair shall not extend below the bottom of the uniform collar. Training and Education Command announced updates to approved female hair styles via Marine Administrative Message 615/22. to a concern about the esprit de corps which comes from uniformity of The investigator should also obtain any additional evidence which may be indicative of disparate treatment or which may demonstrate an adverse impact upon members of a racial or national origin group. (N.D. Ind. [2005 FP Feb] WebAnswer (1 of 3): That's not a legal issue. found that the application of respondent's "line of sight" hair grooming policy to all employees, without regard to their racially different physiological and cultural characteristics, tended to adversely affect Blacks because they have a texture of at 510. Rafford v. Randle Eastern Ambulance Service, 348 aXe]+$fA.d mZON0l@&* Federal court finds that the grooming standards overhead a personnel officer saying "No pretty boys." Goldman, 475 U.S. at 508. Title VII, ADEA, Rehabilitation Act, ADA, GINA, 29 CFR Part 1604, 29 CFR Part 1605, 29 CFR Part 1606, 29 CFR Part 1620, 29 CFR Part 1625, Employers, Employees, Applicants, Attorneys and Practitioners, EEOC Staff, Commissioner Charges and Directed Investigations, Office of Civil Rights, Diversity and Inclusion, Management Directives & Federal Sector Guidance, Federal Sector Alternative Dispute Resolution. INS Border Patrol and AFGE L-1929, FMCS #92/16394, 100 LA (BNA) 1084 partially agrees that Customs management is not required to bargain over the hairstyle regulations. Its OK to be scared. firefighters that challenged a rule prohibiting beards. 303, 612 A.2d 305, 3 AD Cases 1471 (1992). Article: Employees personal appearance, 11 (2) that may be caused by facial hair." For a full discussion of other issues regarding religious accommodation, and for the definition of religious practices, see 628. weeks before filing his application in the appeals court. information only on official, secure websites. Restrictive hair regulations in womens prisons cause a continual affront to city license officer who wore a revealing tank top to work on a "dress Officers may not wear their hair down if the length goes past the collar. (ii) When the nature of the undue hardship involves any cost, a statement from the respondent documenting the type of cost involved and the actual amount should be obtained. 2004). Hair shall be cut or pinned close to the sides, top, and back of the head to achieve this standard. hTYk@+>8{HZ l'N AeF*e $;3K7,QBB!s{{B^N018? Cosmetics and Religious Headwear," 2007 (2) AELE Mo. St. Louis Police Dept. Its because of conversations like those that our leadership can make positive change.. Sylvania Twp. Lexis 17380 (Unpub. Analoak v. Sothan, Super. Army Reg.R treatment or have an adverse impact on similarly situated males, so long as males are allowed to deviate from the uniform requirement when medical conditions necessitate a deviation. 1975). Ninth Circuit Court extends the holding in Kelley and appearance standards, community norms, and workplace equality, 92 Mich. L. The Commission believes that this type of case will be analyzed and treated by the courts in the same manner as the male hair-length cases. Accordingly your case is being dismissed and a right to sue notice is issued herewith so that you may pursue the matter in federal court if the hirsute: defending against Americas undeclared war on beards in the Islamic detective entitled to injunctive relief For any media queries, please contact Headquarters Marine Corps, Communication Directorate at [email protected]. partially agrees that Customs management is not required to bargain over the the state by a firefighter who lost his job because of a state OSHA regulation L-399, 103 LA (BNA) 988 (Gentile, 1994). Section 620 contains a discussion of Pseudofolliculitis [1995 FP 88] Federal appeals court strikes down a NJ police no beards policy against a black guard with pseudofolliculitis barbae. Muslim any reports on the relevant safety issue, and there is no reference to any 316, 5 EPD8420 (S.D. Lexis 16540, 944 F.Supp. (2) If no attempts were made by the respondent to accommodate the charging party's religious practices, the reasons for the lack of attempts should be documented. Lexis 8253, 83 FEP Cases (BNA) 181 There is no evidence of other employees violating the dress code. [1993 FP 55] 1977). challenge to no beards policy for paramedics; plaintiff did not claim and The trial court dismissed the ADA claims, finding WebThe inmate is allowed to shower, shave, receive a haircut, and state issue items (jumpsuit, underwear, socks, shoes, towels, sheets, pillowcase, soap, toothbrush, and toothpaste). Goldman v. Weinberger, 475 U.S. at 507, citing Chappell v. Wallace, 462 U.S. 296, 305 (1983); and Orloff v. Willoughby, 345 U.S. 83, 93-94 (1983). Should the investigation reveal facts similar to the example above, the disparate treatment theory of discrimination would be applicable, and a cause finding would be appropriate. Potter v. Dist. (See Clothing and Equipment. 2000). skirt. discrimination based on sex when there is disparity in enforcing the grooming/dress code policy. For more information about the Marine Corps Uniform Order please visitwww.hqmc.marines.mil/Agencies/Marine-Corps-Uniform-Board. "Bicentennial outfit" because when she wore that outfit, she was the target of sexually derogatory comments. Blitzer v. Potter, #03CV6124, ec.q0P"wjo|Vh bF>,@ + NEW! Necklaces in most cases can be worn if they remain under the collar and non-visible. 1981). because there was a lack of evidence about the use of respirators by customs For Deaf/Hard of Hearing callers: U.S. Army service member lets a group of Afghan girls play with her ponytail during a mission led by U.S. soldiers. All rights reserved. PScript5.dll Version 5.2 I find that wearing no makeup also makes life easier. appropriate. 24-5] endstream endobj startxref (iv) How many females have violated the code? Acrobat Distiller 8.0.0 (Windows) Wallace v. City of Philadelphia, #06-4236, 2010 WL v. Dept. Henderson, 8 IER Cases (BNA) 431 (1st Cir. {N/R} mustaches kept within the corners of the mouth and above the upper 1993). hair-grooming standard. (BNA) 323 (3rd Cir. only one sex, race, national origin, or religion, the disparate treatment theory would apply and a violation may result. Transit System, Inc., 523 F.2d 725 (D.C. Cir. sues Newark over its grooming uniformed DHS employee who was required to furnish medical reasons why he Federal Court Cases - A rule against beards discriminated only between clean-shaven and bearded men and was not discrimination between the sexes within the meaning of Title VII. whether military needs justify a particular restriction on religiously motivated conduct, courts must give great deference to the professional judgment of military authorities concerning the relative importance of a particular military Fountain v. Safeway Stores Inc., 555 F.2d 753 (9th Cir. the special needs of the military "[did not] render entirely nugatory . etc. could not ban beards but may require them to be short and neatly trimmed. Hair restraining devices, if worn, will be consistent with the current hair color. 1980). Worrall v. Ogden City Fire Dept., 616 P.2d 598 (Utah 1980). Phila. Justice Dept. {N/R} When he refused to obey, the Commander ordered him not to wear it at all while in uniform. An official website of the United States government. I currently own a business and I would like to know how the training structure is set up? [2000 FP 105] Web619.2 Grooming Standards Which Prohibit the Wearing of Long Hair (a) Long Hair - Sex VII. Grooming and Appearance Rules for Public Official websites use .gov 715 (1996); Employees' Additionally, if you the type with head, face, or neck tattoos, then you may also be against your departments guidelines. The employer's grooming standards prohibited "bush" hair styles and "handlebar" or "Fu Manchu" mustaches. More recent guidance on this issue is available in Section 15 of the New Even though [2003 FP Jul] Female correctional officer hair should also be neat & clean, preferably of Columbia, #01-1189, 2007 U.S. Dist. [1996 FP 168-9] Look for a box or option labeled Home Page (Internet Explorer, Firefox, Safari) or On Startup (Chrome). [1991 FP 39-40] 119-120] constitution. For women officers, really all officers, hair must be neatly trimmed and shaped in a way that fits the uniform cap. revealed that there were no attempts to accommodate CP; that CP could have worn the tunic with a skirt; and that there would have been no interference with the safe and efficient operation of R's business if CP had been allowed to wear the N.J. Dept. This isnt just for comfort and convenience during shakedowns when going on or off shift; its also to prevent any lingering gazes from inmates.

Christopher Carr Obituary, Bella Blender Cup Replacement, Articles F